The rapid spread of protests across the West under the Black Lives Matter banner left political steam from Baltimore to Berlin. People in positions of authority go out of their way to show that they are tackling endemic racism and, in the commercial sphere, do not find themselves on the wrong side of the debate and do not risk storms and boycotts on Twitter. In a world where nothing is exempt from moral judgment, to be in the trend is to join radical political movements.

This is what Black Lives Matter is. Don’t take my word for it. Take theirs. The wordform that appears on most online posts related to the group’s riffs on “the radical black tradition” which counts the Black Panther Movement and Malcolm X among its past contributors. BLM fortunately identifies itself as a neo-Marxist movement. with various left-wing goals, including funding the police (an evolution of Panther’s position from public open-carry to control the police), to the dismantling of capitalism and the patriarchal system, disrupting the structure of the nuclear family prescribed by the West, seeking remedies from slavery to redistribute wealth and through various branching appeals, to raise funds to free black prisoners awaiting trial. The idea of ​​taking control of the distribution of capital, dismantling the cadres of society, and neutralizing and undermining law enforcement is not only Marxist, but anarchic.

Desperate to quell a loud clamor, celebrities and businesses line up to approve. Airbnb has donated hundreds of thousands of dollars, an ironic move for a company that leverages real estate through occasional rentals, pushing up rental prices and gentrifying neighborhoods, impacting neighborhoods. affordable leases in city centers.

Nike, which has been criticized for using sweatshops to make unaffordable “ambitious” shoes for the poorest in society, is now fighting for racial equality. Amazon has banned police from using its facial recognition software to fight crime, but is happy to push for more privacy.

British tea makers, whose business was built on the backs of slavery and operate on models of neo-colonial plantations where tea is grown and plucked through agrarian labor in the developing world to be shipped for production, packaging and profits in the West surged on the hashtag #Solidaritea. Post-truth absurdity is where we are at. Yet as companies commercially confuse the Black Lives Matter slogan with the Black Lives Matter movement, momentum is building for an organization with little scrutiny or accountability, which is able to engage millions of people and encourage intentionally or not, an outpouring of vandalism, looting and violence across the west.

With huge sums of money pouring in – BLM had already received over $ 100 million from the Open Society Foundations, Ford Foundation, and Borealis Philanthropy, among others – and many goals written straight from the Communist notebook, there is surely place to worry. Black Lives Matter is a somewhat amorphous and decentralized movement, allowing international chapters to settle under their banner. Not having a structure, figurehead or centralized financial control means there is absolutely no accountability. No one to call for an end to violence, while providing a moral shield behind which perpetrators can feel emboldened.

But decentralization does not mean disorganization. Even with a captive, locked-down audience filled with frustration, igniting a series of side protests across the West still requires highly skilled choreography. The kind of operation that requires thousands of avatars to flood social media platforms with calls to action, which can simultaneously target and penetrate entire demographics in various countries. This just isn’t possible for a group of well-meaning activists, however romantic they may be to a cause you wish you were. This can be achieved using sensitive intelligence equipment of a very high standard, of the kind that Deep State operatives have access to.

Throughout history, civil rights movements have been either aided and encouraged or exploited by foreign communist actors, from the American civil rights movement to apartheid in South Africa. By sowing discord in the countries, the socialist militants hoped to maintain fertile grounds for the socio-political fertility. It is entirely possible that a state-backed cyber war from Russia and China will want to exploit and exacerbate the growing discontent while the West is still reeling from the pandemic.

A once small American movement that has seen explosions of activity after individual cases of perceived police brutality has grown into the largest protest movement in Europe and is polarizing societies everywhere it goes. Unlike the predecessors who often fell on the swords of their figureheads, this movement remains impervious to the responsibility of a leader, for there are many of them. What we do know of the few founding members is that many are linked to radical left organizations.

An FBI report released in 2017 found that attacks on police in Baton Rouge, Louisiana and Dallas, Texas were influenced by the Black Lives Matter movement, with 28% of those using lethal force against victims. police motivated by hatred of the police. An unclassified FBI study following the 2016 Dallas cop killings that killed 5 officers by gunshot reported that departments and individual officers were increasingly making the decision to stop proactive police amid attacks. concerns that anti-police mistrust fueled in part by movements like Black Lives Matter had become the “new normal”.

Eric Toussaint: In any case, in my opinion, revolutionary political organizations and all radical social movements must come together. We must break down the wall between political organizations and social movements. Political organizations need to understand that they do not have a monopoly on developing programmatic proposals. Social movements can also help.

We need to design campaigns that bring people together, people who are organized at different levels, including those who, until recently, were not organized. A good example is what happened in France with the Yellow Vest movement, many of whom were people who had virtually no experience of the organization and who took a huge leap forward in their political consciousness and their mode of self-organization, and including forms of action aimed at paralyzing the normal functioning of society. We must therefore adopt forms of action and gathering from which all elitist or Pharisaic behavior, even sectarianism, is excluded. I know how difficult it is, and you in Greece know a lot about it. As I have extensive knowledge of the situation in Greece, I know how it works. So this is the first step. If everyone or much of the radical left takes a doctrinal approach and decides to build or strengthen their own faction or engage in some kind of competition with other groups, we court failure. Thus, the question of unity and the removal of walls between the different types of movements is the most important.

Next, we need emergency proposals that are very radical and far-reaching because people, at least some, want solutions that break with the system. And if the radical left sets limits on its proposals, the racist, macho, fanatic extreme right, including religious obscurantists, will gain the upper hand with its own radical responses. The radical left must therefore be really radical, which was not sufficient in its proposals. It’s far too shy.

As you know, I find it an extremely serious failure that the radical left, apart from saying that the banks should be nationalized, not be able to really take into account the urgency of setting up a campaign of expropriation of the bankers. and capitalists. In addition to reiterating that banks are important; but if you look further, you quickly realize that, as my comrade Patrick Saurin also says, in the radical left, the banks are an issue that is not really thought out, they are simply perceived as enemies, but not analyzed.

Now, if you don’t think and analyze, you can’t really know what to do, you can’t convince people to expropriate the capitalists, because an offensive is about to happen. be launched, and it will be huge.

European central bank
central bank
Institution which in a given state is responsible for issuing banknotes and for controlling the volume of money and credit. In France, it is the Bank of France which assumes this role under the aegis of the European Central Bank (see ECB) while in the United Kingdom it is the Bank of England.

ECB: http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/Pages/home.aspx and governments are using private banks as a tool to act against the economic crisis; it all depends on the banks. While various aids should come directly from public bodies and not go through banks. Or we should socialize the banks and turn them into a public service. Everything currently depends on private banks, with the exception of a few allowances such as unemployment benefits etc. But usually by going through bank accounts, people have to open with private banks.

I must add here that an interesting characteristic of unions in Belgium, I don’t know if you know it, is that they pay unemployment benefits. Thus, in a city like Liège, 40,000 additional people had to receive benefits overnight at the end of March. And everything was managed by the unions and not by the banks. Thus, all union staff had to organize themselves to be in contact with the newly unemployed and pay the allowances allocated.

But it also creates a bind
Bind
A bond is an equity interest in debt issued by a business or government agency. The holder of the obligation, the obligee, is entitled to interest and repayment of the principal. If the company is listed, the holder can also sell the bond on the stock exchange.
, obviously. If when paying for benefits, you can explain “something else has to be done” etc. and you don’t have to use a bank account, you can make other suggestions. It is the most important. I think we must be able to relaunch a mobilizing international initiative.

The last big event we had planned was the first European Social Forum in 2002: it was a great success.

In January 2002, in Porto Alegre, Brazil, we met for the second edition of the World Social Forum, and some of us thought: “Why not convene a first European Social Forum? And we asked a number of organizations and with the Italian Social Forum we had a first meeting in Florence in November 2002. When we did this we had no idea if it would work.

A month before Florence we were really worried because we had sixty thousand registrations from all over Europe and we were wondering how they could be accommodated. Now, of course, the circumstances are different and the main players have changed. But will we be able to relaunch a similar initiative at European or global level? Who can do it? Because, in the meantime, there have been enormous mobilizations. The Arab Spring, the Indignadx in Spain, the movement for the occupation of squares in Greece, “Night standing” in France, the yellow vests, Occupy Wall Street. But none of these movements resulted in an international organization.

It’s impressive. These movements took place roughly at the same time: Arab Spring, Indignadxs, soon followed by the square occupations in Greece in June-July 2011 and Occupy Wall Street, but no international, continental or global structure emerged. And the World Social Forum was becoming obsolete. Is it possible for actors like Attac, CADTM, political organizations and trade unions to convene a real global or European international process?

I am ready to get involved and say: this time political and social organizations must participate with a common platform or call that should be more radical than that of Porto Alegre, so can we do it?

There are old people, like me, we have contacts. But I am convinced that if only the older generation that convened the World Social Forum is involved, it will not work. We must bring the older generation closer to the generations who have experienced new forms of action. But the problem is that among the new generation, there has not necessarily been a process of accumulation and consolidation. So who should we contact among the Yellow Vests?

There are a lot of squatter movements all over Europe; many young radicals,

but they are not federated in a movement of European squatters. There is a housing movement and CADTM activists are involved in it. There are movements around social centers, dispensaries and polyclinics, especially in Greece. But there is no European network. Five or six years ago there was a network for health professionals, but it no longer has any importance at European level. There are contacts between campaigns for asylum seekers’ rights, but there is no single network that connects them. Could the Greek campaign, the one you are involved in, provide the energy to unite other campaigns starting in other countries and connect with other networks such as Via Campesina, the peasants, the World March? women, the CADTM, the Attac network, etc. and build a new project and convene a new global or / and European meeting?

We must think about it, anticipate, it is clear that spontaneous actions like those which took place in 2011 have their limits. We have to have political organizations on board, because here again we have to mention Greece. It is striking to think that I had met a lot of people who became ministers in the Tsipras government, and Tsipras himself, at the European Social Forum, and before at the G7 counter-summit in Genoa in 2001, then at the Forum. in Florence and the last time I saw them was in 2006 at the old Athens airport, Hellinikon, in May 2006. I saw people who were going to become ministers or senior executives at Syriza and cut off or even betray the social movement and the popular classes. So for me one of the lessons is that if we are rebuilding an initiative, political movements must be part of it. They must be there so that they are empowered by social mobilization.

Of course, this will not prevent betrayals, compromises, on the part of a lot of people, but we have to demand a lot more responsibility. Because why was the European Social Forum founded? Because the Italian Social Forum supported the Prodi government because the friends of the Italian Social Forum supported the Communist Refoundation (and I also had friends there) who supported the Prodi government. And the Social Forum in Brazil sank when the CUT and the Sin Tierra movement supported the Lula government as it implemented liberal social policies, and when the Indian movements, which were really strong and had succeeded in bringing together 120,000 people at the Mumbai Social Forum, supported the government of the Congress Party. This means that we have had a number of anti-globalization social movements that have aligned themselves with governments that implement social-liberal policies. We must learn from it. It wasn’t just Tsipras’ betrayal in 2015. It was exactly the same kind of mistake as the Communist Refoundation in 2004-2005, if I remember correctly. There is a kind of continuity and we must therefore contribute through this kind of debate to reconstruct the memory of what has happened over the past twenty years to avoid repeating the same mistakes.

Alexis Cukier: I suggest ending with this call for critical thinking and internationalist action. We’ve been talking for a little over an hour.

Thank you very much Eric.

Thank you everyone. The debate continues in many other contexts.

Eric Toussaint: Absolutely.

Eric Toussaint interviewed by Alexis Cukier.

Translation: Snake Arbusto and Christine Pagnoulle

Eric Toussaint: In any case, in my opinion, revolutionary political organizations and all radical social movements must come together. We must break down the wall between political organizations and social movements. Political organizations need to understand that they do not have a monopoly on developing programmatic proposals. Social movements can also help.

We need to design campaigns that bring people together, people who are organized at different levels, including those who, until recently, were not organized. A good example is what happened in France with the yellow vests movement, many of whom were people who had virtually no experience of organizing and who took a huge leap forward in their political consciousness and their mode of self-organization, and including forms of action aimed at paralyzing the normal functioning of society. We must therefore adopt forms of action and gathering from which all elitist or Pharisaic behavior, even sectarianism, is excluded. I know how difficult it is, and you in Greece know a lot about it. As I have extensive knowledge of the situation in Greece, I know how it works. So this is the first step. If everyone or much of the radical left takes a doctrinal approach and decides to build or strengthen their own faction or engage in some kind of competition with other groups, we court failure. Thus, the question of unity and the removal of walls between the different types of movements is the most important.

Next, we need emergency proposals that are very radical and far-reaching because people, at least some, want solutions that break with the system. And if the radical left sets limits on its proposals, the racist, macho, fanatic extreme right, including religious obscurantists, will gain the upper hand with its own radical responses. The radical left must therefore be really radical, which was not sufficient in its proposals. It’s far too shy.

As you know, I find it an extremely serious failure that the radical left, apart from saying that the banks should be nationalized, not be able to really take into account the urgency of setting up a campaign to expropriate the bankers. and capitalists. In addition to repeating that banks are important; but if you look further, you quickly realize that, as my comrade Patrick Saurin also says, in the radical left, the banks are an issue that is not really thought out, they are simply perceived as enemies, but not analyzed.

Now, if you don’t think and analyze, you can’t really know what to do, you can’t convince people to expropriate the capitalists, because an offensive is about to happen. be launched, and it will be huge.

European central bank
central bank
Institution which in a given state is responsible for issuing banknotes and for controlling the volume of money and credit. In France, it is the Bank of France which assumes this role under the aegis of the European Central Bank (see ECB) while in the United Kingdom it is the Bank of England.

ECB: http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/Pages/home.aspx and governments are using private banks as a tool to act against the economic crisis; it all depends on the banks. While various aids should come directly from public bodies and not go through banks. Or we should socialize the banks and turn them into a public service. Everything currently depends on private banks, with the exception of a few allowances such as unemployment benefits etc. But usually by going through bank accounts, people have to open with private banks.

I must add here that an interesting characteristic of unions in Belgium, I don’t know if you know it, is that they pay unemployment benefits. Thus, in a city like Liège, 40,000 additional people had to receive benefits overnight at the end of March. And everything was managed by the unions and not by the banks. Thus, all union staff had to organize themselves to be in contact with the newly unemployed and pay the allowances allocated.

But it also creates a bind
Bind
A bond is an equity interest in debt issued by a business or government agency. The holder of the obligation, the obligee, is entitled to interest and repayment of the principal. If the company is listed, the holder can also sell the bond on the stock exchange.
, obviously. If when paying for benefits, you can explain “something else has to be done” etc. and you don’t have to use a bank account, you can make other suggestions. It is the most important. I think we must be able to relaunch a mobilizing international initiative.

The last big event we had planned was the first European Social Forum in 2002: it was a great success.

In January 2002, in Porto Alegre, Brazil, we met for the second edition of the World Social Forum, and some of us thought: “Why not convene a first European Social Forum? And we asked a number of organizations and with the Italian Social Forum we had a first meeting in Florence in November 2002. When we did this we had no idea if it would work.

A month before Florence we were really worried because we had sixty thousand registrations from all over Europe and we were wondering how they could be accommodated. Now, of course, the circumstances are different and the main players have changed. But will we be able to relaunch a similar initiative at European or global level? Who can do it? Because, in the meantime, there have been enormous mobilizations. The Arab Spring, the Indignadx in Spain, the movement for the occupation of squares in Greece, “Night standing” in France, the yellow vests, Occupy Wall Street. But none of these movements resulted in an international organization.

It’s impressive. These movements took place at about the same time: Arab Spring, Indignadxs, soon followed by the square occupations in Greece in June-July 2011 and Occupy Wall Street, but no international, continental or global structure emerged. And the World Social Forum was becoming obsolete. Is it possible for actors like Attac, CADTM, political organizations and trade unions to convene a real global or European international process?

I am ready to get involved and say: this time political and social organizations must participate with a common platform or call that should be more radical than that of Porto Alegre, so can we do it?

There are old people, like me, we have contacts. But I am convinced that if only the older generation that convened the World Social Forum is involved, it will not work. We must bring the older generation closer to the generations who have experienced new forms of action. But the problem is that among the new generation, there has not necessarily been a process of accumulation and consolidation. So who should we contact among the Yellow Vests?

There are a lot of squatter movements all over Europe; many young radicals,

but they are not federated in a movement of European squatters. There is a housing movement and CADTM activists are involved in it. There are movements around social centers, dispensaries and polyclinics, especially in Greece. But there is no European network. Five or six years ago there was a network for health professionals, but it no longer has any importance at European level. There are contacts between campaigns for asylum seekers’ rights, but there is no single network that connects them. Could the Greek campaign, the one you are involved in, provide the energy to unite other campaigns starting in other countries and connect with other networks such as Via Campesina, the peasants, the World March? women, the CADTM, the Attac network, etc. and build a new project and convene a new global or / and European meeting?

We must think about it, anticipate, it is clear that spontaneous actions like those which took place in 2011 have their limits. We have to have political organizations on board, because here again we have to mention Greece. It’s startling to think that I had met lots of people who became ministers in the Tsipras government, and Tsipras himself, at the European Social Forum, and before at the G7 counter-summit in Genoa in 2001, then at the Forum. in Florence and the last time I saw them was in 2006 at the old Athens airport, Hellinikon, in May 2006. I saw people who were going to become ministers or senior executives at Syriza and cut off or even betray the social movement and the popular classes. So for me one of the lessons is that if we are rebuilding an initiative, political movements must be part of it. They must be there so that they are empowered by social mobilization.

Of course, this will not prevent betrayals, compromises, on the part of a lot of people, but we have to demand a lot more responsibility. Because why was the European Social Forum founded? Because the Italian Social Forum supported the Prodi government because the friends of the Italian Social Forum supported the Communist Refoundation (and I also had friends there) who supported the Prodi government. And the Social Forum in Brazil sank when the CUT and the Sin Tierra movement supported the Lula government as it implemented liberal social policies, and when the Indian movements, which were really strong and had succeeded in bringing together 120,000 people at the Mumbai Social Forum, supported the government of the Congress Party. This means that we have had a number of anti-globalization social movements that have aligned themselves with governments that implement social-liberal policies. We must learn from it. It wasn’t just Tsipras’ betrayal in 2015. It was exactly the same kind of mistake as the Communist Refoundation in 2004-2005, if I remember correctly. There is a kind of continuity, and we must therefore contribute through this kind of debate to reconstruct the memory of what happened over the past twenty years to avoid repeating the same mistakes.

Alexis Cukier: I suggest ending with this call for critical thinking and internationalist action. We’ve been talking for a little over an hour.

Thank you very much Eric.

Thank you everyone. The debate continues in many other contexts.

Eric Toussaint: Absolutely.

Eric Toussaint interviewed by Alexis Cukier.

Translation: Snake Arbusto and Christine Pagnoulle

The progressive left and its media comrades have struggled in recent weeks to build a friendly story for “antifa”.

It is not an easy task. These self-proclaimed “anti-fascists” (hence the name) have shown up at rallies across the country since Trump’s inauguration, assaulting police with urine bombs, beat reporters bloodied, and putting the occasional car on Fire. All of this is sort of meant to protest fascism. Or Inequality. Or capitalism. It really depends on the day.

The good news is that knowing Antifa is to despise it.

Last weekend at BerkeleyAmerica saw him at a supposed “anti-hate rally,” 13 ranks of antifa have been arrested for fiercely attacking law-abiding protesters who back the Trump administration. After a series of gang-type ambushes on the streets, some of which were caught on a spooky video, the list of suspected charges against antifa included assault with a lethal weapon and criminal assault.

Unlike Charlottesville a few weeks ago, there was no proper Nazi rally in Berkeley, just a few regular Trump supporters gathered to exercise their First Amendment rights. It was too much.

Trump supporters clash with hundreds of protesters at massive rally in Berkeley https://t.co/GPICJMRCGB pic.twitter.com/M62XReWovO

– The hill (@thehill) August 28, 2017

Antifa has revealed itself to be a pack of childish vandals masquerading as heroic resistance. That a crowd of predominantly white men gather in paramilitary formation, dressed in head-to-toe black, with masks and batons to protest against “fascism,” shows that this group has no sense of religion. ‘story.

That some of his assault soldiers use shields with “no hate” on them like rams shows that they have no sense of irony either. There isn’t much that favorable media coverage can do to downplay or obscure the truth about antifa, and that is anti-free speech fanaticism. Berkeley’s violence broke that barrier.

Now the political left feels exposed. Otherwise, sympathetic outlets have called for “introspection”About antifa, and even Nancy Pelosi finally felt the need to denounce the violence of the masked malcontents. But nothing that we have seen from Antifa is new.

WATCH: Fox News contributor calls on Democrats to denounce antifa groups https://t.co/ABtwD5pmXd pic.twitter.com/hO6UU0HTPI

– The hill (@thehill) August 28, 2017

Despite some media efforts to explain the obvious, antifa has always been entirely indefensible. It is not a political movement, it is an explosion of violence, an expression of the delusional emotionality of the progressive left. Its primary mission is not opposition to fascism, but the suppression of ideas.

Words more than anything else seem to arouse the wrath of Antifa. They don’t rally against specific policies, for example, but they will swarm, threaten and shut down conservative speakers on college campuses. Antifa claims for herself the heckler’s veto under the guise of so-called “nazi punchBut he rarely, if ever, tries to hit real Nazis.

And so this lie is exposed for what it really is: an excuse to inflict violence on any ideological opponent, at any time, for any reason. All they have to do is use the term “Nazi” to smear a conservative, and fundamental respect for the freedom and rights of others no longer applies.

We cannot allow such brutality to dictate political discourse. This is a deeply disturbing trend that extends far beyond the fringe factions of the left. Hysterical progressives have been brainwashed into believing that the speech they dislike is hate speech, that hate speech amounts to violence, and therefore violence to prevent such hate speech is justifiable .

Pelosi condemns ‘antifa’ protesters after violent clashes with Trump supporters https://t.co/neWqEeEUA4 pic.twitter.com/8CI6zKUl7Y

– The hill (@thehill) August 30, 2017

It is not enough to oppose loud and clear, they must be silent. Antifa wants to prevent certain speeches from happening, and he will use brute force to do so. It is simply censorship imposed by threats of violence, hiding behind the facade of a courageous struggle against Trump’s creeping fascism.

In reality, antifa is the closest thing to an authoritarian political movement in this country, and its ideology is a serious threat to freedom. Any concessions on their side only encourage the radical elements to demand even more restrictions on expression. Whether these hard-line leftists either failed to read or understood, the First Amendment is all too obvious. Nonetheless, it is incumbent on the rest of us – Republicans and Democrats – to educate the antifa about the non-negotiable place of free speech in America.

And it’s going to require saying a lot of things that they will consider hateful.

Buck Sexton is a political commentator, national security analyst and host of the nationally syndicated radio show, “Buck Sexton with America Now”. He is a former CIA officer at the Counterterrorism Center, appears frequently on Fox News Channel and CNN, and has been a guest radio host for Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity. Follow Buck on Twitter @BuckSexton.

The views expressed by contributors are theirs and not those of The Hill.

He said only a fraction – he estimated 12% – of Russians are currently oriented towards Europe, but he hoped to convince many others that they should be too.

“I see that I could perhaps offer myself to the European part of the population as their political representative,” he said. “I don’t know if it will work or not, but I will try. “

He expressed some reluctance to become the leader of Russia himself. “I really hope they find someone else,” he said. “Historically, the person in charge during the transition period most likely ends up in prison.”

Then he added, laughing, “I’ve had enough.

The idea can be fancy anyway. Oligarchs like Mr. Khodorkovsky, let alone those of Jewish descent, have never been particularly popular in Russia, where they are accused of stealing state property before Mr. Putin’s rise to power.

Moreover, Mr. Khodorkovsky has not dared to return to Russia since his release. Nezavisimaya Gazeta, a Russian newspaper, wrote after its latest announcement that “the most notorious political refugee risks being portrayed as the enemy of the country”.

But his supporters said he shouldn’t be underestimated. And those he met in Washington were struck by his determination. “I have to say I’m impressed with him,” said David J. Kramer, president of Freedom House, which promotes democracy and human rights around the world. “But he’s still looking for how he can make a difference. And it is obviously very difficult to do from outside the country.

He arrived in Washington with some of the same entourage he had for many years, including his lawyers, Anton Drel and Maria Logan, and his longtime translator. Her son, Pavel, 29, who was living in the United States when his father was arrested and then founded his own group to defend civil society in Russia, was seated at his table during the Freedom House dinner.